Mr. Hancock’s messages present an on-the-make politician who as soon as hoped that the pandemic may vault his profession to the subsequent degree. When a London paper printed a plan to chop the approval time for a vaccine, he texted an aide, “I CALLED FOR THIS TWO MONTHS AGO. It is a Hancock triumph!”
But at different instances, Mr. Hancock appeared a decided policymaker, battling ministers who he believed have been prioritizing the economic system over public well being. When Alok Sharma, who served as enterprise secretary, proposed loosening the test-and-trace necessities for diners at eating places, Mr. Hancock texted the cupboard secretary, Simon Case, to say that he couldn’t perceive “why Alok is towards controlling the virus. Unusual method.”
“Pure Conservative ideology,” Mr. Case replied in a remark that drew hearth from critics who mentioned that it was improperly partisan for a civil servant. Mr. Case, who was appointed by Mr. Johnson, can be in scorching water for arguing that trusted native officers, not the prime minister — whom he deemed untrustworthy — ought to roll out new pointers.
In his assertion, Mr. Hancock expressed chagrin concerning the embarrassment the leaks have been inflicting his former colleagues. He mentioned that he labored with Ms. Oakeshott for greater than a 12 months on the e-book, which was printed final December and which drew closely from the WhatsApp messages, in addition to from different sources.
He claimed that she had damaged a confidentiality settlement in publishing the texts and had distorted them by not offering context. “Releasing them on this means provides a partial, biased account to go well with an anti-lockdown agenda,” he mentioned.
Ms. Oakeshott, a former political editor of The Sunday Instances, didn’t deny breaching a authorized settlement. However she mentioned that she had been prepared to take that threat and denied that The Telegraph, which has editorialized towards lockdowns, was publishing them selectively. Editors, she mentioned, had assigned eight individuals to comb by 2.3 million phrases of texts, 4 instances the size of Tolstoy’s “Struggle and Peace.”
“The paper has been terribly cautious to not cherry-pick bits of dialog,” she famous. “The group has been meticulous concerning the course of.”
