‘I Wanted to Punch Kanye’ — Free Speech Waffler Elon Musk’s Nonsensical Take on Bitcoin, CBDCs, and Censorship – Op-Ed Bitcoin News

0
170

[ad_1]

“Vox Populi, Vox Dei, man.” So says self-proclaimed Chief Twit Elon Musk from a personal jet flying excessive above the world throughout a Twitter Areas look on Sunday, Dec. 4 (JST). It does sound good to say, however the voice of the mob ought to by no means be the voice of “God.” The explanations are myriad. Suffice it to say that in the identical method failed crypto-exchange CEO Sam Bankman-Fried supposedly set off Musk’s BS detector, so ought to Musk be setting off our personal alarm bells. His actions merely don’t match his nice-sounding phrases, and anybody who refuses to know free speech can be going to overlook the boat on crypto and financial freedom.

God Save the ‘Technoking,’ the Folks Are Disposable

Tesla CEO and self-proclaimed “free speech absolutist” Elon Musk lately ended a massively-tuned-into Dec. 4 Twitter Space hosted by Mario Nawfal, by noting that we stay in a time which, completely different from instances previous, doesn’t contain “some king or no matter [that would] simply by default suppress” free speech. That is fascinating, given this appears to be precisely the position self-labeled “Technoking” Musk is filling through his newly acquired social media platform, by arbitrarily and single-handedly deciding who will get to remain and what they’ll or can not say. Musk acts, as billionaire entrepreneur and crypto advocate Mark Cuban has lately famous, like a one-man “decide and jury.” Cuban tweeted to Musk on Nov. 29:

We do not know what Free Speech on Twitter is since you are decide and jury. There is no such thing as a transparency.

Certainly, it’s now Elon’s platform. He can do what he needs, and I’m 100% okay with him doing that in precept, ignoring the obvious challenge that social media platforms are large information assortment businesses for the state, full with special government portals for the management of “misinformation.” That very matter was introduced as much as Elon, by the way in which, and he mentioned: “I gotta dig into this trusted partnership factor. Clearly that has like some large brother vibes … Twitter will adhere to the legislation, however it’s not going to transcend the legislation.”

Anyway, as an precise freedom absolutist (voluntaryist) myself, I’ve to place this Fed-funded Musk to the take a look at. As “non-public” as his picture could also be now, he’s clearly able of state-influenced energy which could possibly be an enormous detriment to on a regular basis people and free speech/crypto advocates down the road. Whereas he famous repeatedly that he needs Twitter to “come clear” about its previous “suppression of data” in relation to U.S. electoral politics, Musk nonetheless delivered many blended messages.

'I Wanted to Punch Kanye' — Free Speech Waffler Elon Musk’s Nonsensical Take on Bitcoin, CBDCs, and Censorship

‘Free Speech Absolutist’ Musk ‘Personally Wished to Punch Kanye’ However Permits Murdering and Baby-Abusing Politicians on His Platform

Let me be very clear that I’m not saying that is intentional right here — it might ostensibly be a product of extreme statist brainwash or ignorance — however Musk does permit literal little one molesters (individuals who contact youngsters inappropriately) and child-murder approvers (drone warfare govt signatories akin to Joe Biden, Donald Trump, and Barack Obama) on the Twitter platform. They’re seemingly welcomed with wide-open arms.

And for those who name these atrocities and such tragic lack of life happening mere “collateral injury,” or “misrepresented love of youngsters” I’m simply going to snicker at you and name you an fool, since you are. I might additionally ask you to be the primary to volunteer your self and your youngsters as victims of such assaults and sexual improprieties the subsequent time a bankers’ warfare or pervert politician involves your city. However I digress.

On the similar time Musk permits these creeps on Twitter, he arbitrarily refuses to reinstate the account of controversial discuss present host Alex Jones (one other suspect character). It’s because, in accordance with Musk: “I’ve no mercy for anybody who would use the deaths of youngsters for acquire, politics or fame.” Jones, for his half, used free speech to query the official narrative of the 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, inflicting a media uproar. Nonetheless distasteful which will appear to some, it by no means compares with the precise homicide and abuse perpetrated by these allowed to stay on Twitter.

'I Wanted to Punch Kanye' — Free Speech Waffler Elon Musk’s Nonsensical Take on Bitcoin, CBDCs, and Censorship

Together with saying we shouldn’t use the dying of youngsters for acquire, Musk quoted Jesus of the Christian Bible and advised a disputed story about his personal little one’s tragic dying to additional emotionalize his level — a narrative which Musk’s ex-wife says was not even true. Whoever is true or fallacious right here, Musk did all this, paradoxically, underneath a Sam Harris tweet. For these unaware, the famend atheist thinker Harris was not so way back on the media scorching seat for proclaiming:

Hunter Biden actually might have had the corpses of youngsters in his basement, I might not have cared.

Elon Musk seemingly has no downside with this. Within the House, he even proclaimed: “Hunter Biden appears type of enjoyable, to be sincere.” The tales and concepts above are all so tragic and/or disgusting that disputing particulars appears nearly insensitive, on both aspect, however a dispassionate look underneath the microscope of motive is important so as to preserve rational readability, and to keep away from being tricked by manipulators who love to cover behind simply such so-called taboo and “unmentionable” subjects. Sacred cows.

As for the reinstatement of former U.S. president Donald Trump’s account, Musk had initially advised “the folks” a council can be figuring out such actions, however this plan was scrapped in lieu of a single Twitter ballot from Elon’s private account.

Nonetheless, the “Vox Populi” demanding Alex Jones be introduced again, and urgent questions on what constitutes so-called “destructive” or “hate” tweets — which Musk mentioned would now be “max deboosted” and demonetized underneath his new rule — was summarily ignored by the self-crowned tech king.

'I Wanted to Punch Kanye' — Free Speech Waffler Elon Musk’s Nonsensical Take on Bitcoin, CBDCs, and Censorship

Musk additionally lately banned hip-hop star Kanye West (who himself appears to me — for a lot of causes — one other shill character designed to fire up misguided chaos and muddy the waters) for sharing a controversial image, and after feedback about Nazis and Hitler in an interview with Alex Jones. Musk said within the Dec. 4 Twitter House that Ye’s current tweet was an unlawful “incitement to violence” particularly as a result of:

I personally needed to punch Kanye, in order that was positively inciting me to violence.

For sure, “incitement to violence” doesn’t imply phrases that make one particular person really feel like utilizing literal violence in opposition to the speaker. Irrespective of how ludicrous or insensitive the phrases — or on this case, picture — could also be. Incitement to violence is saying one thing akin to “Let’s all go rob Joe tomorrow!” It’s past the scope of this text to go deeper into the conduct of narcissists and megalomaniacs, however speaking endlessly about saving humanity, posturing as a literal messiah determine, and pondering you get to bodily hurt folks due to their phrases is just not often a superb signal. As H.L. Mencken famously wrote:

The urge to save lots of humanity is nearly all the time solely a false-face for the urge to rule it. Energy is what all messiahs actually search: not the possibility to serve.

Elon’s Bitcoin and CBDC Confusion: ‘Cash Is Digital Already’

Within the Dec. 4 Twitter area, joined by the likes of Ben Stiller, Musk’s mom, and a slew of militantly-moderate-opinion-toting normies, Musk was requested if he was frightened concerning the fast creation of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) throughout the globe. Like all of the vital questions within the stay stream, he lived as much as his self-applied label of being “fanatically average,” and refused to reply immediately. As a substitute, Musk introduced some weird concepts implying that CBDCs would actually be no completely different than the digital fiat forex we use right this moment.

Ignoring the truth that retail CBDCs can perform as programmable cash issued immediately by reckless governments and central banks, and their equally disastrous policies — with the added capability to ‘bake in‘ mechanisms like taxation, digital ID, destructive rates of interest, and potential social credit score programs proper into the cash itself — Musk diverted the dialog by specializing in the antiquated tech of right this moment’s digital model of fiat, for a straightforward snicker from the all-to-eager followers listening.

Whereas brazenly acknowledging that “you’ll be able to starve folks to dying” with draconian management of financial programs earlier within the House, he nonetheless mentioned: “I believe they’re conflating a number of issues. To begin with, nearly all cash is digital already,” Musk mentioned, noting: “Whether or not banks create their very own cryptocurrencies I believe is considerably irrelevant. Folks will use the cryptocurrencies that they suppose will accrue worth over time and never use those that don’t.”

In fact, it’s unsettling for a supposed tech genius to disregard the vital distinction between precise crypto like bitcoin money or monero and CBDCs. Particularly, that the latter entails the violent force of the state. The one particular person who appeared to even barely push again in opposition to’s Musk’s assumptions throughout the Twitter House was Kim Dotcom, however total, and even from Kim, the quantity of rear-end licking happening all through was fairly nauseating.

Musk’s lacking the boat on crypto and cash shouldn’t shock us. In any case, he has missed the boat on free speech, and these two ideas are inextricably related. Governments are already cracking down on mere code, as evidenced by the current United States OFAC ban and sanctions on the Twister Money mixing platform.

It was this similar ostensible tech whiz Musk that failed to know bitcoin’s minimal impact on, and even benefits for, the climate and environment (particularly in comparison with issues just like the fiat banking system’s power consumption, non-public jets always flying to Davos, and the dropping of bombs on folks all around the world). Musk has as a substitute chosen to push the local weather panic and urge for a carbon tax, whereas canceling bitcoin payments at Tesla. Once more, both he’s performing and gaslighting you, or isn’t really very shiny.

'I Wanted to Punch Kanye' — Free Speech Waffler Elon Musk’s Nonsensical Take on Bitcoin, CBDCs, and Censorship
A nonetheless from the movie “Collateral Homicide” that includes Wikileaks footage of American forces in Iraq opening fireplace on 12 people together with journalists and two youngsters.

Utilizing Musk’s ‘Bull**** Meter’ Towards His Personal Actions

No matter you consider concerning the official narratives relating to freedom activist whistleblowers Julian Assange and Edward Snowden, Musk’s milquetoast stance on the 2 within the Dec. 4 Twitter House hosted by Nawfal is telling.

It’s laborious to look at the Wikileaks footage exposing the homicide of harmless folks by U.S. forces in Iraq, together with journalists and youngsters, and never really feel illness and rage boiling in your abdomen on the injustice. One would think about that on the very least, a free speech absolutist like Musk can be a hundred percent on the aspect of exposing such horrific crimes. However once more, the self-proclaimed “fanatic average” chewed his lips, answering:

“I don’t know sufficient concerning the Assange scenario to present an correct reply. There are issues the place nationwide safety stuff is concerned that I believe do should be stored secret,” Musk mentioned. He concluded that, relating to NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden: “Most likely one of the best factor can be a jury of the general public.”

When pressed by Kim Dotcom, who famous that the authorized system within the U.S. would render such a jury unimaginable, as exposing information akin to Snowden did is a criminal offense regardless, Musk gave up, sheepishly copping out:

I don’t know. I imply, there’s no simple reply to the Snowden/Assange scenario.

A lot for the voice of the folks, I assume. There really is a straightforward reply for a “free speech absolutist,” and it’s not what Musk mentioned. Adherence to draconian statist legislation gave the impression to be the working thread all through Elon’s complete Areas interview: We’ll do what we are able to, so long as it doesn’t battle with the authorized system, in different phrases. And, as evidenced by his current single-handed Twitter bans, so long as it doesn’t damage his emotions. To suppose that the fawning followers throughout the Areas session had been involved about his security from the powers that be. Why would he fear when he has simply brazenly said he won’t ever disobey them?

When requested a couple of dialog Musk had with failed FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried within the House, Musk mentioned:

Deep perception wasn’t essential. If somebody’s calling you to speak about investing in an enormous transaction they need to be asking questions concerning the transaction, not speaking about themselves, and speaking on the pace of an auctioneer. It didn’t require deep perception to determine that the bull**** issue is excessive.

I undergo you, reader, that if somebody is presenting themselves as a “free speech absolutist,” crypto advocate, and candidate for savior of humanity from the uncontrollable NPC left and big-gov/big-tech oppression, they shouldn’t be a fed-funded, carbon-tax-pushing, gov-contract-having, centralized-content-censoring, WEF-young-global-leader-being, Canadian-Social-Credit-Party-chair-descended, neuralink-monkey-brain-damaging, New-World-Order-jacket-wearing, technocrat-social justice warrior who needs to bodily assault folks for the mere phrases they are saying.

'I Wanted to Punch Kanye' — Free Speech Waffler Elon Musk’s Nonsensical Take on Bitcoin, CBDCs, and Censorship

Free speech absolutist. Okay. Cool story, bro.

In Conclusion: One thing Is Very Fallacious Right here

Wanting round on the world and again at historical past, the Vox Populi is clearly not the Vox Dei — except god is a raging fool. And within the case of Hitler, the Vox Populi in Germany beloved him. If Elon was really as shiny as they are saying, he would stay by a few of the many correct phrases he has spoken. For instance, when he famous that the state is a monopoly on violence. However, for no matter motive, as a substitute of talking out in opposition to that very same state, and pushing for a extra voluntary and free market/open supply society which really can be conducive to free speech and crypto innovation and peace — like voluntaryism — Musk contracts with it, and pushes for extra of the identical oppression, however in a extra misleading method. Meet the brand new boss, worse than the woke boss.

Towards the top of his look on the Twitter House, Musk famous that account verification will seemingly be extra particularly leveraged to eliminate bots, however who is aware of precisely what this course of will ultimately entail. It might imply that people wishing to have a voice on the platform and stay non-public and nameless, might have a troublesome time of it. “So there can be a gold examine mark for industrial organizations, a grey examine mark for governments, and a blue examine mark for verified people,” Musk famous. “There can be a powerful coverage in opposition to impersonation and deception,” he added.

Musk is a troublesome case as a result of he usually sounds convincing, talking generalized, cliched truths to oppressed folks determined for an escape from the woke technocratic nightmare that’s occurring. He’s the right synthesis of an elitist Hegelian dialectic to pacify and gaslight (deliberately or in any other case) dissenters on each side of the pretend bipartisan political scheme, permitting those who have all the time managed the world — the eugenicists, bankers, and secretive pursuits behind closed doorways, to proceed duping “the folks.”

In different phrases, it’s all an enormous pro-wrestling present, happening whereas the overarching draconian agendas involving CBDCs, world surveillance, and impending local weather lockdowns transfer steadily ahead. As such, what’s perceived as Gospel reality by the bulk — the “Vox Dei” — is nearly all the time lunacy. If I’m deemed a lunatic for taking this view, properly, time will inform it.

However within the phrases of AC/DC’s Brian Johnson within the hit track “Hells Bells”: “If god’s on the left, I’m stickin to the [apolitical] proper.”

To take heed to Musk’s Twitter Areas look, one can achieve this on Twitter here, or on Odysee, here.

Tags on this story
alex jones, Altruism, bitcoin cash, CBDC, central bank digital currency, Code Is Speech, Donald Trump, Economic Freedom, Free Speech, Government, Great Reset, H.L. Mencken, Joe Biden, Julian Assange, Kanye West, Kim Dotcom, Mario Nawfal, Monero, Musk, Musk Free Speech, Narcissism, New World Order, Politics, Social Credit, Social Media, Tornado cash, Twitter, Twitter Spaces, UBI, Voluntaryism, War Crimes, Wikileaks

What do you concentrate on Musk? Tell us within the feedback part under.

Graham Smith

Graham Smith is an American expat residing in Japan, and the founding father of Voluntary Japan—an initiative devoted to spreading the philosophies of unschooling, particular person self-ownership, and financial freedom within the land of the rising solar.

Picture Credit: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons



[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here