The choice to shut down Signature Financial institution had “nothing to do with crypto,” stated the New York State Division of Monetary Companies, the regulator that took possession of the troubled financial institution on Sunday. The monetary watchdog insisted that its resolution to place Signature Financial institution in receivership “was based mostly on the present standing of the financial institution and its means to do enterprise in a secure and sound method.”
‘Nothing to Do With Crypto’
After the New York State Division of Monetary Companies (NYDFS) took possession of Signature Financial institution on Sunday, there have been speculations relating to whether or not the regulatory motion was linked to cryptocurrency.
Former U.S. Consultant Barney Frank, who was concerned within the drafting of the Dodd-Frank Act and had been a member of Signature Financial institution’s board since 2015, believes that the regulator’s transfer was associated to cryptocurrency. He advised CNBC Monday:
I feel a part of what occurred was that regulators needed to ship a really sturdy anti-crypto message.
“We grew to become the poster boy as a result of there was no insolvency based mostly on the basics,” he opined.
In September final 12 months, the cryptocurrency sector accounted for practically 25% of Signature Financial institution’s complete deposits. Nevertheless, the financial institution stated in December that it plans to cut back crypto-related deposits by $8 billion.
Responding to claims that the closure of Signature Financial institution was crypto-related, a spokesperson for the New York State Division of Monetary Companies advised Fortune:
The selections revamped the weekend had nothing to do with crypto. The choice to take possession of the financial institution and hand it over to the FDIC [Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation] was based mostly on the present standing of the financial institution and its means to do enterprise in a secure and sound method on Monday.
The NYDFS spokesperson additional shared that withdrawal requests ballooned over the weekend however Signature Financial institution failed to offer dependable and constant information.
Relating to crypto, the spokesperson said that the NYDFS “has been facilitating well-regulated crypto actions for a number of years, and is a nationwide mannequin for regulating the area.”
Frank expressed shock on the New York state regulator’s assertion that its resolution to take possession of Signature Financial institution was unrelated to cryptocurrency. Claiming that to his data, the financial institution’s executives have been working to offer information to regulators, he insisted:
I feel that [crypto] was an element … I’m puzzled as to why it [Signature Bank] was closed.
“What we heard from our executives is that the deposit scenario had stabilized and they’d be getting the capital from the low cost window and I proceed to be satisfied that if we had opened on Monday given the bulletins of these two insurance policies, we might have been in a fairly good condition and positively purposeful,” the previous congressman claimed.
Do you assume the closure of Signature Financial institution has one thing to do with crypto? Tell us within the feedback part beneath.
Picture Credit: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons
Disclaimer: This text is for informational functions solely. It’s not a direct supply or solicitation of a suggestion to purchase or promote, or a suggestion or endorsement of any merchandise, providers, or corporations. Bitcoin.com doesn’t present funding, tax, authorized, or accounting recommendation. Neither the corporate nor the writer is accountable, instantly or not directly, for any harm or loss induced or alleged to be attributable to or in reference to using or reliance on any content material, items or providers talked about on this article.
