Objections Raised Over Appointment of Sullivan & Cromwell as Debtors’ Counsel for FTX – Bitcoin News

0
167

[ad_1]

On Friday, chapter decide John Dorsey permitted the legislation agency Sullivan & Cromwell (S&C) to be appointed because the debtors’ counsel for FTX, regardless of an objection from Daniel Friedberg, a former FTX US compliance officer. Throughout a Zoom presentation, Friedberg claimed there was a battle of curiosity between former and present FTX executives and FTX US’ basic counsel, as Ryne Miller as soon as labored for S&C. Decide Dorsey, nonetheless, was not swayed by Friedberg’s 17-page objection and appointed S&C, stating that “there’s no proof of precise battle right here.”

FTX Chapter Raises Questions of Battle of Curiosity and Odd Selections

The day earlier than chapter decide John Dorsey permitted Sullivan & Cromwell (S&C) to symbolize the debtors as authorized counsel, James “Metalawman” Murphy revealed a Twitter thread explaining that it was odd that S&C would seemingly be chosen for FTX illustration. “There’s one thing off with the FTX chapter,” Murphy insisted in his put up. Murphy, an legal professional who focuses on metaverse, Web3, and digital asset topics, questioned the involvement of John J. Ray III, the brand new FTX CEO and chief restructuring officer, within the course of.

The legal professional Murphy factors out that when Ray labored with Enron because the chief restructuring officer, Ray did a superb job aggressively pursuing recoveries for the good thing about Enron’s collectors. Nonetheless, Murphy said that Ray is performing very in another way from the hard-bargaining CEO he was often known as at Enron and questioned this modification in angle. For instance, the metaverse lawyer detailed that when he was restructuring Enron, Ray by no means instructed for a second that one in all Enron’s main outdoors legislation companies ought to function debtor’s counsel.

“Inexplicably, Mr. Ray now helps S&C’s transfer to function debtors’ counsel,” Murphy noted. The lawyer additional mentioned that that is regardless of S&C dealing with “20 engagements for FTX in simply 16 months,” being “paid $8.5 million in charges,” and “representing key figures [Sam Bankman-Fried] and [Nishad Singh] personally.” Murphy remarked that at Enron, Ray “aggressively pursued claims towards Enron’s outdoors legislation companies.” The lawyer continued:

Vinson & Elkins paid $30 million to settle and Andrews Kurth paid $18.5 million. Based on an impartial report, these companies failed to answer purple flags suggesting doable misconduct.

Murphy additionally opined that the final word irony of this example is that the large charges will likely be paid by the victims of the FTX fraud — the shoppers. “My prediction: The unified entrance of Mr. Ray, the Official Collectors Committee, and S&C will prevail, and the decide will appoint Sullivan & Cromwell debtors’ counsel … This isn’t regular,” Murphy concluded. Throughout the listening to the subsequent day, Daniel Friedberg, a former FTX US compliance officer, objected to S&C being appointed and submitted a 17-page objection for the chapter decide to evaluation. Within the submitting, the previous FTX US compliance officer mentioned that Ryne Miller, FTX US’ basic counsel, was once employed by S&C.

“Mr. Miller knowledgeable me that it is extremely necessary for him personally to channel loads of enterprise to S&C as he wished to return there as a companion after his stint with the debtors,” Friedberg’s grievance particulars. Regardless of the objection, Chapter Decide Dorsey instructed court docket individuals that “there’s no proof of precise battle right here,” including that it was “rumour, innuendo, hypothesis, rumors, and definitely not one thing I might permit to be launched into proof.”

After S&C was appointed as debtors’ counsel, James “Metalawman” Murphy added his two cents in regards to the determination. “As anticipated, the decide approves Sullivan & Cromwell as debtors’ counsel. Decide says, on the file earlier than him, he has no concern about S&C conflicts of curiosity,” Murphy wrote. “Any suspense about this determination was eradicated when the U.S. Trustee switched place to favor S&C’s appointment.” The identical day, U.S. federal prosecutors seized almost $700 million in belongings from the disgraced FTX co-founder Bankman-Fried.

Tags on this story
20 engagements, attorney, bankrupcty proceedings, Bankruptcy Case, bankruptcy judge, chief restructuring officer, conflict, Conflict of Interest, counsel, court case, Customers, Daniel Friedberg, debtors’ counsel, digital asset subjects, Enron, Fee payments, Fees, former FTX US compliance officer, ftx, general counsel, James “Metalawman” Murphy, John Dorsey, John J. Ray III, Lawyers, legal counsel, litigation firm, Metaverse Lawyer, New FTX CEO, Nishad Singh, ryne miller, S&C, Sam Bankman-Fried, sbf, Sullivan Cromwell, Twitter thread, Web3 attorney, Zoom presentation

What do you concentrate on the appointment of Sullivan & Cromwell as debtors’ counsel for FTX and the allegations of battle of curiosity raised by former FTX US compliance officer Daniel Friedberg and James “Metalawman” Murphy? Share your ideas within the feedback beneath.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman is the Information Lead at Bitcoin.com Information and a monetary tech journalist dwelling in Florida. Redman has been an lively member of the cryptocurrency neighborhood since 2011. He has a ardour for Bitcoin, open-source code, and decentralized functions. Since September 2015, Redman has written greater than 6,000 articles for Bitcoin.com Information in regards to the disruptive protocols rising immediately.




Picture Credit: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This text is for informational functions solely. It’s not a direct supply or solicitation of a proposal to purchase or promote, or a suggestion or endorsement of any merchandise, companies, or corporations. Bitcoin.com doesn’t present funding, tax, authorized, or accounting recommendation. Neither the corporate nor the creator is accountable, straight or not directly, for any harm or loss precipitated or alleged to be attributable to or in reference to the usage of or reliance on any content material, items or companies talked about on this article.



[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here