FTX Debtors’ List of Assets Omits Mention of Large Stash of NFTs and ENS Names Owned by Alameda  – Bitcoin News

0
144


This week, FTX debtors issued a press launch and a 20-page doc noting that chapter directors had positioned $5.5 billion in liquid property. The doc particulars that investigators found fiat currencies, crypto property, and securities as a part of FTX’s and Alameda Analysis’s cache. Nonetheless, the disclosure to unsecured collectors doesn’t point out the extraordinarily giant stash of non-fungible tokens the corporate had accrued over time.

FTX and Alameda’s Liquidated Property Embrace 1000’s of NFTs and ENS Names

FTX’s interior circle and the quantitative buying and selling firm Alameda Analysis have been closely concerned within the non-fungible token (NFT) hype that started in 2021. The truth is, after FTX and Alameda filed for chapter safety, our information desk parsed via numerous Alameda/FTX-associated wallets and found hundreds of NFTs and Ethereum Title Service (ENS) names.

The discoveries have been derived from wallets labeled by Block researcher Larry Cermak and parsed information from the crypto monitoring software Arkham Intelligence and dappradar.com‘s portfolio viewer. For instance, the Alameda-linked handle “0x116” holds round $100,000 in crypto tokens, nevertheless it additionally holds 107 ENS names. It’s doable that Alameda thought it may flip ENS names sooner or later, because the agency obtained a large number of widespread names.

FTX Debtors' List of Assets Omits Mention of Large Stash of NFTs and ENS Names Owned by Alameda
Alameda Analysis-linked ENS names.

Alameda and now the liquidators personal ENS names equivalent to “tickets.eth,” “fee.eth,” “community.eth,” “dungeon.eth,” “packager.eth,” “nootropic.eth,” “breakfast.eth,” and plenty of extra. Most aren’t price very a lot, however among the particular ENS names like “fee.eth” and “community.eth,” have bought for near $9,000 per title. Alameda’s ENS title assortment is just not talked about within the 20-page presentation proven to FTX’s unsecured collectors.

Final 12 months in January, there have been loads of controversies when a couple of mirrored non-fungible token (NFT) collections appeared on the scene, copying the art work of Cryptopunks and Bored Ape Yacht Membership (BAYC) NFTs. Curiously, Alameda’s ETH handle “0x0f4” holds an enormous amount of unofficial “flipped” Cryptopunks and “mirrored” BAYC NFTs.

FTX Debtors' List of Assets Omits Mention of Large Stash of NFTs and ENS Names Owned by Alameda
Alameda Analysis owns a dozen Meebits, 2 MAYCs, and a superb handful of blue-chip NFTs.

The “0x0f4” handle holds 2,447 NFTs within the pockets from 629 totally different NFT collections. Alameda’s “0x0f4” collected NFTs from compilations equivalent to Time Frog, Celebration-Animals, Metawarden, Shrouded Playground, and plenty of extra from dozens of comparatively unknown NFT collections.

Alameda collected blue-chip non-fungible tokens (NFTs) as effectively, and records present the agency obtained 11 reputable Cryptopunks, that are collectively price an estimated $784,000. The buying and selling platform bought seven totally different Artwork Blocks Curated, which have an estimated worth of round $1.47 million on Jan. 20, 2023.

FTX Debtors' List of Assets Omits Mention of Large Stash of NFTs and ENS Names Owned by Alameda
Blue-chip NFTs price vital worth and owned by Alameda Analysis, in line with 21shares information hosted on Dune Analytics.

Alameda and now the liquidators personal 81 land NFTs from The Sandbox, that are collectively price an estimated $155,000. Alameda obtained two Otherdeeds as effectively, which are actually price round $25,000, and 12 totally different Meebits, that are valued at an estimated $88,000 right now. A substantial amount of blue-chip NFTs may be discovered within the ETH handle “0xca4.”

That particular pockets holds a few of Alameda’s most precious NFTs, together with the Otherdeed land titles and two Mutant Ape Yacht Membership (MAYC) NFTs price roughly $50,000 in mixed worth. Larry Cermak’s Alameda handle record highlights roughly 29 totally different Ethereum addresses. Moreover, Arkham Intelligence information signifies that there are 68 addresses tied to the quantitative buying and selling platform Alameda Research.

Out of the big swath of Alameda addresses, a good handful of the wallets personal NFTs. Most of those wallets are assumed to be managed by the FTX bankruptcy team and liquidators. Simply in tokens alone, Alameda’s 68 tethered Ethereum-based wallets point out a web worth of round $189.12 million.

Tags on this story
Alameda Research, Art Blocks Curated, Bankruptcy, Blockchain, Blue-Chip NFTS, controversy, crypto assets, crypto-art, cryptopunks, Digital Assets, Digital Collectibles, Digital Identity, digital ownership, digital rights, ENS, ERC1155, ERC721, Ethereum, Ethereum Name Service, ftx, Land NFTs, liquid assets, Meebits, Metaverse, NFT marketplace, NFTs, Non-fungible tokens, Otherdeeds, Ownership, quantitative trading, Scarcity, Securities, tokenization, Value, virtual goods, Virtual Worlds, Wallet

What do you consider Alameda’s involvement within the NFT and ENS title markets? Tell us what you consider this topic within the feedback part beneath.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman is the Information Lead at Bitcoin.com Information and a monetary tech journalist dwelling in Florida. Redman has been an energetic member of the cryptocurrency neighborhood since 2011. He has a ardour for Bitcoin, open-source code, and decentralized functions. Since September 2015, Redman has written greater than 6,000 articles for Bitcoin.com Information concerning the disruptive protocols rising right now.




Picture Credit: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, Editorial credit score: Arkham Intelligence visualization, Dune Analytics, dappradar.com,

Disclaimer: This text is for informational functions solely. It’s not a direct supply or solicitation of a suggestion to purchase or promote, or a suggestion or endorsement of any merchandise, providers, or corporations. Bitcoin.com doesn’t present funding, tax, authorized, or accounting recommendation. Neither the corporate nor the writer is accountable, instantly or not directly, for any harm or loss precipitated or alleged to be brought on by or in reference to using or reliance on any content material, items or providers talked about on this article.





Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here