The clerical intercourse abuse scandal festered after which broke open below Pope John Paul II within the years that Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger — who would later change into Pope Benedict XVI — headed the Vatican’s doctrinal workplace, which dealt with the instances of monks accused of abusing youngsters.
Introduced with case information, Cardinal Ratzinger typically set disciplinary measures in movement, even having accused monks defrocked. However different occasions, the document exhibits, he took the facet of the accused monks and did not take heed to the victims or their warnings that an abuser may violate extra youngsters.
When Cardinal Ratzinger turned pope, the scandal exploded publicly all through the worldwide church.
Throughout his time as pope, his efforts to rid the church of what he referred to as “filth” went additional than these of John Paul II, however he was reluctant to carry bishops accountable for shuffling abusive monks from task to task, angering survivors and advocates.
Benedict himself was swept up within the scandal after the discharge of a report in January 2022 that had been commissioned by the Roman Catholic Church in Munich to analyze the archdiocese’s dealing with of sexual abuse from 1945 to 2019.
The report claimed that Benedict had mishandled 4 instances many years earlier involving the sexual abuse of minors whereas he was an archbishop in Germany. It additionally accused him of getting misled investigators in his written solutions.
Two weeks after the report was launched, Benedict acknowledged that “abuses and errors” had been made. He requested for forgiveness however denied any misconduct.
Survivors and victims teams had combined emotions about his legacy.
“Ratzinger was much less communicative than Francis however he moved” in the correct course, when it got here to confronting the clerical abuse scandal, the primary pope to essentially accomplish that, stated Francesco Zanardi, the founding father of Rete l’Abuso, the biggest victims group in Italy. That stated, “the actual problem is altering the tradition of particular person bishops, and that may be monumental.”
Anne Barrett Doyle, a co-director of BishopAccountability.org, a victims advocacy and analysis group, stated in a press release that Benedict could be “remembered mainly for his failure to realize what ought to have been his job one: to rectify the incalculable hurt achieved to the lots of of 1000’s of kids sexually abused by Catholic monks.”
When he resigned, Benedict “left lots of of culpable bishops in energy and a tradition of secrecy intact,” she stated.
“As a substitute of treatments, he gave us phrases,” Ms. Barrett Doyle stated. “His failure to enact actual change within the church’s dealing with of sexually abusive monks shall be his important and shameful legacy.”
The Survivors Community of these Abused by Monks, often known as SNAP, was harsh in its evaluation of how Benedict handled clerical abuse.
“In our view, the loss of life of Pope Benedict XVI is a reminder that, very similar to John Paul II, Benedict was extra involved concerning the church’s deteriorating picture and monetary movement to the hierarchy versus greedy the idea of true apologies adopted by true amends to victims of abuse,” SNAP stated in a press release on Saturday.
“It’s previous time,” the group stated, “for the Vatican to refocus on change: inform the reality about recognized abusive clergy, defend youngsters and adults, and permit justice to those that have been harm.”
“Honoring Pope Benedict XVI now shouldn’t be solely mistaken. It’s shameful,” SNAP stated.
