Washington Post, Forbes, Wall Street Journal Slammed for ‘Puff Piece’ Reports on FTX and Alameda Execs – Bitcoin News

0
136


Following the extremely criticized New York Instances article that options commentary from the previous CEO of FTX, Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), the general public continues to offer the mainstream media flak for publishing “puff items” about SBF and the Alameda Analysis govt Caroline Ellison. A lot of articles have been known as out for being too lenient on the previous FTX and Alameda executives and even going as far complimenting the people.

Critics Say Particular FTX-Associated Articles Printed by Forbes, Washington Publish, and the Wall Road Journal Give Reward to FTX and Alameda Execs

On Nov. 15, 2022, Bitcoin.com Information printed an article concerning the criticism a New York Instances (NYT) article acquired after it printed an article that mentioned the previous FTX govt Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) was sleeping higher and enjoying video video games. Folks weren’t too happy with the NYT article, and critics mentioned on the time that the information publication went smooth on SBF. The NYT article will not be the one editorial that mainstream media (MSM) shops have printed that has caught flak for being smooth on former FTX and Alameda executives and even praising the people.

As an example, critics slammed the Washington Publish’s Dan Diamond for his report known as “Earlier than FTX collapse, founder poured tens of millions into pandemic prevention.” Diamond’s report highlights SBF’s vital donations towards initiatives that might forestall one other pandemic like Covid-19.

Washington Post, Forbes, Wall Street Journal Slammed for 'Puff Piece' Reports on FTX and Alameda Execs

Nonetheless, when the Washington Publish tweeted Diamond’s story, the information outlet was dunked on for giving SBF reward. “Cease making him look noble. He was a criminal working a Ponzi scheme,” on particular person wrote to the Washington Publish (WP). One other individual replied to the WP’s tweet and mentioned: “The place is the half that claims ‘This Is a Sponsored Publish.’”

The economist and dealer Alex Krüger additionally knocked the WP article when he tweeted:

Unbelievable. The @washingtonpost additionally determined to write down about FTX as if it had been the case of a nicely intentioned charitable entrepreneur, quite than what it’s: probably the most egregious monetary fraud of the 21th century. What a shame.

Public Opinion Has Spoken: No One Cares That Alameda’s Prime Exec Was a ‘Harry Potter Fan’ or So-Known as ‘Math Whiz’

Some individuals called the Washington Publish reporters clowns, and quite a few individuals called Diamond’s reporting a “puff piece.” The NYT article and the Washington Publish editorial weren’t the one articles condemned for singing reward to FTX and Alameda executives. A Forbes article was additionally slammed for propping up the previous Alameda Analysis CEO Caroline Ellison.

On the time, the Twitter account known as “Uncommon Whales” tweeted: “That is wild by Forbes. Caroline Ellison known as a ‘math whiz’ and an individual who ‘takes huge dangers.’” Uncommon Whales added:

Quite than being known as a person who went in opposition to FTX’s personal phrases of companies, allegedly used buyer funds, and has not confronted recourse.

Moreover, when Forbes shared the article on Twitter, the outline mentioned that the FTX story was a “new darling of the alt-right.” One individual wrote: “What occurred to Forbes? They was higher.”

“This spin is ridiculous. Caroline is ridiculed by everybody on the fitting and left,” Wayne Vaughan tweeted in reply to the Forbes’ tackle Caroline Ellison. The whistleblower generally known as “Fatman” additionally shared his two cents on the MSM tales masking SBF and Alameda’s Ellison.

Washington Post, Forbes, Wall Street Journal Slammed for 'Puff Piece' Reports on FTX and Alameda Execs

He additionally shared a screenshot of a reporter from Forbes that wished to report on Ellison in a “nuanced means.” “I imagine somebody is funding a media marketing campaign to affect the narrative across the FTX crew – who ought to be seen as nothing in need of supervillains,” Fatman said. “Here’s a Forbes reporter searching for beneficial feedback from ‘supporters’ as an alternative of reporting on the precise details.”

The Wall Road Journal (WSJ) has additionally been grilled for reporting on Alameda’s Ellison in a positive method. On the Reddit discussion board r/cryptocurrency, the Redditor “kindred_asura” shared a WSJ article that concentrates on Ellison. “Entrance web page puff-piece about Caroline Ellison proper now on the WSJ. Not ONE point out of fraud or unlawful actions,” the Redditor mentioned. The Reddit submit acquired roughly 811 upvotes earlier than r/cryptocurrency moderators determined to eliminated the submit.

Washington Post, Forbes, Wall Street Journal Slammed for 'Puff Piece' Reports on FTX and Alameda Execs

“I certain want I by no means simply ‘discover myself’ dropping billions of shoppers’ funds whereas working a fraudulent enterprise,” the Redditor u/kindred_asura commented. Total, quite a lot of individuals appear to imagine that MSM has purposely dropped the ball when reporting on FTX and Alameda executives.

Furthermore, social media and Reddit discussion board posts fairly arguably point out that nobody cares about SBF donating tens of millions for pandemic prevention. Additional, the a whole lot of feedback on social media and boards counsel that individuals definitely don’t care about Ellison’s so-called “nerdy” habits and the truth that she likes Harry Potter.

Tags on this story
Alameda executives, Alameda Research, Alex Kruger, Articles, Caroline Ellison, Critics, Dan Diamond, Fatman, Forbes, ftx, FTX execs, FTX executives, Mainstream media, msm, NYT, pandemic prevention, r/Cryptocurrency, Reddit forum, Sam Bankman-Fried, sbf, Unusual Whales, Wall Street Journal, washington post, Wayne Vaughan, WP reporter Dan Diamond, WSJ

What do you consider the reporting mainstream media has executed to this point on the FTX scandal? Tell us what you consider this topic within the feedback part beneath.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman is the Information Lead at Bitcoin.com Information and a monetary tech journalist residing in Florida. Redman has been an lively member of the cryptocurrency neighborhood since 2011. He has a ardour for Bitcoin, open-source code, and decentralized functions. Since September 2015, Redman has written greater than 6,000 articles for Bitcoin.com Information concerning the disruptive protocols rising immediately.




Picture Credit: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, Twitter,

Disclaimer: This text is for informational functions solely. It isn’t a direct provide or solicitation of a suggestion to purchase or promote, or a suggestion or endorsement of any merchandise, companies, or corporations. Bitcoin.com doesn’t present funding, tax, authorized, or accounting recommendation. Neither the corporate nor the writer is accountable, instantly or not directly, for any harm or loss brought about or alleged to be brought on by or in reference to the usage of or reliance on any content material, items or companies talked about on this article.





Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here