Earlier than turning into Twitter’s CEO, proprietor, and “Chief Twit,” Elon Musk had typically lobbed criticism on the platform for its strategy to content moderation, even going as far as to target the corporate’s former coverage chief Vijaya Gadde. However whereas Musk has expressed his concern about “liberal bias” on the platform, many activists, journalists, and advocates exterior the US—the place the majority of Twitter’s customers reside—have begun to fret about how Twitter, now with out a board or shareholders and led by a CEO with a number of enterprise entanglements, will reply to authoritarian and authoritarian-leaning governments which have lengthy sought to manage public opinion.
“How he treats stress from nations like Saudi Arabia and India—I feel these are key indicators of the place he’s going with the platform,” says David Kaye, former UN particular rapporteur on the appropriate to freedom of opinion and expression and scientific professor of legislation on the College of California, Irvine.
Whereas Twitter doesn’t boast almost as many customers as Meta-owned Fb or Instagram, it’s extensively utilized by activists, civil society teams, journalists, and politicians—all of whom are influential in shaping public coverage and opinion. The platform has additionally proved essential for these organizing protests in locations like India, Nigeria, and Argentina, and has supplied an avenue for these residing in extremely managed societies like Saudi Arabia to voice criticism of their governments.
Jason Pielemeier, government director of the International Community Initiative, says Musk’s purpose to construct Twitter’s person base to greater than a billion people might additionally have an effect on his willingness to battle it out with overseas governments to maintain content material on the platform.
Though they might not characterize an enormous share of Twitter’s income stream proper now, nations like Turkey, Indonesia, Nigeria, and Pakistan, which have very massive, more and more on-line populations, are all enticing markets as the corporate appears to develop its income and enhance its person base, in response to Pielemeier. However all of these nations have had arguments with Twitter particularly or with social media corporations extra broadly, he says. Final yr, the Nigerian authorities ordered all Web Service Suppliers (ISPs) to dam Twitter after the platform deleted a tweet from the nation’s president, Muhammadu Buhari, for violating its insurance policies. The federal government lifted the ban solely after Twitter agreed to open an workplace within the nation and pay native taxes.
In India, Twitter’s third largest market, the corporate filed a case earlier this yr to contest the federal government’s order to take away particular person items of content material in addition to complete accounts that the federal government considers a threat to India’s safety or sovereignty.
However Raman Jit Singh Chima, senior worldwide counsel and Asia Pacific coverage director at Entry Now, worries that Twitter beneath Musk could not proceed with the lawsuit. (In his August countersuit towards Twitter, Musk cited the lawsuit in India as a risk to the corporate’s presence in its third largest market.) “It will be a vindication of a really problematic, unconstitutional set of actions by the Indian authorities,” he says. “It additionally sends a sign to the worldwide tech business, saying ‘Again off, don’t attempt to do extra.’”
